|
Post by IAOMAS on Feb 2, 2005 17:30:14 GMT
Quite simply, shall we update the number of posts it takes to get the status things on the forum?
I know they are fun things, but I feel we should up the level!
I can do it & keep it a secret as well.. much fun!
Admin
|
|
|
Post by Olivier Van-Overbeek on Feb 2, 2005 18:18:38 GMT
why not, keeps things interesting.
Oli
ps. that doesn't mean any and tim can post useless posts again!!!!!!! ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by Andy "Mr Miyagi" Wright on Feb 2, 2005 18:41:27 GMT
useless posts here we go.................!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
seriously, why?
|
|
|
Post by Tim White on Feb 3, 2005 14:12:49 GMT
Okay,
Who says our post are meaningless. We always have something useful to say. No matter what the situation might be.
Tim
|
|
|
Post by Andy "Mr Miyagi" Wright on Feb 3, 2005 18:11:58 GMT
Okay, Who says our post are meaningless. We always have something useful to say. No matter what the situation might be. Tim i disagree, my posts ARE meaningless, and I have NOTHING useful to say except BAH HUMBUG.
|
|
|
Post by Olivier Van-Overbeek on Feb 3, 2005 21:53:38 GMT
Okay, Who says our post are meaningless. We always have something useful to say. No matter what the situation might be. Tim no offence tim, however i seem to recall a 'period' where some of your posts, euhum, where a tad bit less relevant! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Glen Doecke on Feb 4, 2005 0:06:17 GMT
I voted yes, it might me a minor matter but it was fun going up through the ranks.
|
|
|
Post by Tim White on Feb 4, 2005 21:16:47 GMT
Andy Despite your, humbleness, you have always had meaningful posts.
Tim
LOL
|
|
|
Post by Andy "Mr Miyagi" Wright on Feb 5, 2005 8:19:55 GMT
aw thanks tim. actually i was using reverse psychology; if you say you dont want something, sometimes you get it...
|
|
|
Post by Alex Catterall on Feb 5, 2005 13:54:53 GMT
Could be fun.
Keep the lower levels the same but the highest ones could be ludicrously high.
|
|
|
Post by Tim White on Feb 15, 2005 6:56:45 GMT
no offence tim, however i seem to recall a 'period' where some of your posts, euhum, where a tad bit less relevant! ;D[/quotes] Oli, They all might not have been totally relevant, but they were meaningful. Tim
|
|
|
Post by Switch3sixty (Anton) on Feb 22, 2005 11:22:12 GMT
Could be fun. Keep the lower levels the same but the highest ones could be ludicrously high. Same as ^^^ maybe there should've been a third option for the poll
|
|
|
Post by laz on Feb 22, 2005 11:42:02 GMT
You could do it on a logatirmicish scale.
10 posts for novice 20 for junior 50 for learning 100 for getting better 250 for no-longer-a-grasshopper 500 for scary 1000 for big-daddy 2000 for wise-master 5000 for wise-grand-master 10000 for optimus-prime. 20000 for get-a-life-or-a-girlfriend?
etc etc. You have to study more years to advance per dan grade normally in MA, how about in iaomas forums???
|
|
|
Post by laz on Feb 22, 2005 11:54:53 GMT
logarithmic-ish even!
|
|
|
Post by IAOMAS on Feb 22, 2005 14:30:28 GMT
You could do it on a logatirmicish scale. 10 posts for novice 20 for junior 50 for learning 100 for getting better 250 for no-longer-a-grasshopper 500 for scary 1000 for big-daddy 2000 for wise-master 5000 for wise-grand-master 10000 for optimus-prime. 20000 for get-a-life-or-a-girlfriend? etc etc. You have to study more years to advance per dan grade normally in MA, how about in iaomas forums??? Nice ideas, unfortunatly we only have 5 spaces we can use for names via post titles.. maybe whittle down the list a bit!
|
|